(Source: Australian National Accounts: National Income, Expenditure and Product. Complete statistical tables available from the Australian Bureau of Statistics)

In cutting its cash rate for the second time during this easing cycle, Bullock called the move a “confident” cut. As the chart below demonstrates (Source: The Reserve Bank of Australia, Consumer Price Inflation – G1), Australia’s inflation has returned to pre-pandemic norms. Bullock described a broad-based slowing in price increases, leading to a forecast for “the underlying pulse of inflation around the midpoint of the 2 to 3 per cent range over the next year or so.” With that trend firmly in place, she concluded: “with inflation declining and the unemployment rate relatively low, we’re well positioned to deal with” the challenges presented by the U.S.’s trade war with the rest of the world.

(Full inflation data at Consumer Price Index, Australia)

Stable Inflation Enables Renewed Easing of Monetary Policy

The U.S.’s trade war threatens renewed inflation pressures through global supply chain disruptions. The RBA is monitoring these developments closely, forecasting “growth in our major trading partners slowing over the remainder of this year and next year.” At the same time, it has revised its domestic growth forecast expecting the economy to grow “a little more slowly,” and sees “global trade developments” as mostly deflationary—aside from inflationary supply shocks from the trade war. These factors underlie the RBA’s confidence in continuing the rate-cutting cycle.

The RBA has also been transparent about its easing bias. Bullock noted: “if we were just looking at where the domestic economy was at the moment, would we be looking at lowering rates or not, and as I said earlier with inflation in the band and also employment doing pretty well, we think there is a bit of scope to lower interest rates.” Even with labor market tightness, she added, “it does seem that inflation is continuing to come down notwithstanding a bit of tightness in the labour market.” Moreover, “inflation is right on target from a six-month annualised point of view.”

Looking ahead, the RBA sees conditional room for further easing: “I think if we continue to observe inflation coming down and staying down sustainably, then to the extent that we think there’s still restrictiveness in monetary policy—and we think there is a bit—then that would give us opportunities to lower the interest rate further.” However, Bullock acknowledged that renewed strength in consumer demand could change the equation: “If it looks like things pick up much more quickly than we thought they would… then all the cost pressures that the businesses are saying, well, they might be able to pass them on. That might be the risk on the upside, and the question there would be for us: are we still restrictive enough to keep that under control or do we need a bit more restrictiveness?”

Risks: A Fog of Unpredictability

Still, global and domestic risks remain. Bullock was frank about the external backdrop: “the situation we’re in is it’s not just uncertain, it’s actually unpredictable.” While the Federal Reserve has remained frozen—on high alert for stagflation—Australia is benefitting from a policy window (that may close in unpredictable ways).

Domestically, the RBA continues to monitor labor market imbalances. Bullock noted that “employment growth, the participation rate, vacancy rates, all these sorts of things are suggestive of the labour market still being quite tight.” On the other hand, consumption has not yet responded as expected to rising real incomes and falling rates: “We’ve been a little bit surprised that consumption hasn’t recovered as real incomes have started to recover. It’s just a bit softer than we thought it would be if you think about historical relationships. We thought it would have done better. So that’s the risk, that households for some reason are being much more cautious than they have been in the past and that that is a downside for the economy.”

The RBA has also shown intellectual flexibility in revisiting its assumptions: “we are open to the idea that we may be overestimating, or underestimating full employment, and I think that’s a healthy thing for us.”

Even amid these uncertainties, Australia’s anchored inflation and resilient labor conditions help reinforce the Australian dollar’s appeal as a mispriced asset in a volatile global landscape.

Trade Shocks: The Global Wildcard

Although Australia has a handle on its domestic picture, external shocks remain a major variable. Bullock acknowledged that the RBA, “just like everyone else, was completely blown out of the water by the scale and the scope” of the U.S.’s trade war. “So we really had to go back and have a much harder look. So there has been a lot of analysis done… and the Board does have to consider and factor much more of this into their thinking than was the case back before this all happened.”

While the RBA braces for future trade war storms, the U.S. Federal Reserve is in the center of the storm. The Fed is bracing for staglfationary impacts from the trade war and, as a result, remains stuck with inaction even as current inflation falls further from the Fed’s policy rate. Australia, by contrast, enjoys the flexibility of acting on current data and trends.

Conclusion: A Value Currency with Upside

Australia is entering a policy sweet spot: inflation is within target, the labor market remains robust, and GDP growth is beginning to recover. The country’s policy flexibility and economic trajectory stand in contrast to that of the U.S., where a hawkish Fed is constrained by future inflation expectations and geopolitical risk.

From a currency trading perspective, the Australian dollar looks as a value currency—undervalued after years of economic drag and monetary tightening…even with concerns about Chinese growth.

The following weekly chart of Invesco CurrencyShares Australian Dollar Trust (FXA) (currency pair AUD/USD) shows 14-year pressure on the Australian dollar versus the U.S. dollar. assuming the pandemic lows hold, the time looks ripe for a sustained turnaround.

Be careful out there!

Full disclosure: long AUD/USD, long AUD/JPY

The post Inflation at Target and GDP Growth Recovery: A Comeback Case for the Australian Dollar appeared first on Inflation Watch.

Most telling in today’s performance was Powell’s dance around the questions trying to reconcile the economic forecasts with the rate forecasts. They seem inconsistent at best and make little sense at worst: one rate cut and no further progress on inflation (core PCE (Personal Consumption Expenditures)). The quotes below come from Powell’s introductory remarks.

• A midpoint expectation for one rate cut in 2024: “If the economy evolves as expected, the median participant projects that the appropriate level of the federal funds rate will be 5.1 percent at the end of this year, 4.1 percent at the end of 2025, and 3.1 percent at the end of 2026.” Note that the current rate is set to 5.25% to 5.50%. March’s median projection was 4.6% for year-end.
• Core PCE projection for 2024 increased from March’s 2.6% to 2.8% for 2024 and going to 2.0% in 2026. Core PCE has shown no downward momentum yet this year. It has gone from 2.9% in January to 2.8% from February through April. Thus, the Fed expects no further progress on inflation this year.
• The Fed made no changes to its GDP growth forecasts: 2.1% this year, and 2.0% for the next two years.
• The Fed made a slight change to its unemployment forecast. This year stayed at 4.0%. The rate went from 4.1% to 4.2% next year and from 4.0% to 4.1% in 2026.

Put it all together, and it is not clear why the Fed wants to cut rates at all this year. I made this point last month in “Fed’s Powell Avoids Rate Cut Talk While April CPI Keeps Hope Alive” and in March in “Financial Conditions Make A Monetary Roundtrip and Undercut the Need for Rate Cuts“. Now, with no forecasted progress in core PCE inflation for this year, the Fed seems to risk sticky inflation staying sticky for longer if it cuts rates before seeing the “sustained progress” Powell talks about ad nauseam. In this latest round, Powell repeated the policy principle yet again: “we don’t think it’ll be appropriate to reduce rates and begin to loosen policy until we have more confidence that inflation is moving back down to 2% on a on a sustainable basis and that’s the that’s the test we’ve applied”.

When Powell was asked about the conundrum, I expected him to untangle the problem by indicating these forecasts are interdependent and assume that the underlying economic mechanisms that connect all these factors work out as expected. For example, one hypothetical would be a world without a rate cut in 2024 which undermines the rosy projections for GDP and employment. Instead, Powell essentially undermined the meaningfulness of the forecasts.

Powell began by explaining away the sticky core PCE with a technical discussion about lapping lower readings from last year. He essentially suggested that the sticky core PCE is an artifact of tough comparables and thus not as meaningful as it seems at first glance. More baffling was Powell’s attempt to reconcile a year-end forecast that is higher than analyst forecasts for core PCE in May while at the same time forecasting a rate cut:

“it’s a forecast a fairly conservative forecast month by month that would lead to slightly higher…12 months rates by the end of the year if we get…better ratings than that then you will see that come down or remain the same. If you’re at 2.6 2.7 [for May] you know that’s that’s a really good place to be.”

In other words, this last lonely rate cut rushing toward the departure gate looks like the Fed’s fleeting attempt to throw the market a bone and deliver permission to continue to rally in anticipation of a rate cut cycle.

The Teflon S&P 500

The S&P 500 went into the Fed announcement at all-time highs and trading well above its upper Bollinger Band (BB) (the black lines defining price volatility in the chart below). From a technical perspective the S&P 500 is in an extremely stretched position to the upside. The small fade into the close still left the index quite stretched (short-term) to the upside.

The market gapped up in the morning presumably on a favorable print for the CPI (Consumer Price Index). However, while Powell acknowledged the positive development, he still threw cold water on the idea that this report finally gave the Fed permission to proceed with rate cuts:

“…we see today’s report as progress and as you know building confidence, but we we don’t see ourselves as having the confidence…that would warrant beginning to loosen policy.”

I am impressed the S&P 500 held on to any gains for the day. Then again, the index, and the stock market in general, has over the course of time acted like teflon against the on-going slippage in the forecast for lower rates.

The Trapped Bond Market

The stock market’s teflon has occasionally emerged tarnished by rising long-term bond yields. The breakout (lower yields) for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) earlier in June paved the way for the latest phase in the stock market’s rally. Yet, the S&P 500 did not come down with a pullback to the previous downtrend channel. TLT’s fade from last week’s high, as Powell made the case for a dovish hawkishness, may set the stage for a new trading range that traps the bond market in a new sideways trading channel. If so, the S&P 500 can detach more clearly from the machinations in yields. To-date, the on-going expectations for rate cuts has been an important driver helping the S&P 500 eventually recover from fears over long-term bond yields even as market breadth has waned.

In the meantime, I bought TLT put options as a trade on the presumed, new range.

Be careful out there!

Full disclosure: long TLT puts, long SPY puts and put spread

The post Fed’s Powell Avoids the Obvious: Inflation and Interest Rate Forecasts Make Little Sense appeared first on Inflation Watch.

I break down the key components of Powell’s observations (using the transcript from the CNBC TV recoding of the live event) and then juxtapose them with the prospects for inflation going forward.

The S&P 500 (SPY) since the October lows overlayed with my past short-term trading calls. (Source: Tradingview.com)

Is Policy Really Restrictive?

Powell observed that “the labor market is about as tight as it was before the pandemic in 2019, and that’s good. Real wages are now positive, and unemployment has been below 4% for 27 consecutive months, something that hasn’t happened in half a century. So, the labor market is very strong, with signs of gradual cooling and rebalancing, so that the supply and demand for workers are coming back into balance, just as we would want.” The logic did not make sense at first. Powell provided the evidence of balance in the labor market later on in the discussion. He noted that “the ratio of vacancies to unemployed people, for example, has gone from more than 2 to 1 to now 1.3 to 1, and it was 1.2 before…You also see wages coming down, and you see quits coming down.” Most importantly, Powell used these observations as evidence that “policy is probably restrictive.”

Powell went on to add that restrictive policy is weighing on rate-sensitive spending. However, the conventional indicators of financial conditions still show they are just as loose as they were before the Fed started hiking, January 28, 2022 to be exact. In other words, either the market has done some serious advanced front-running of rate cuts or current policy is not nearly as restrictive as the Fed thinks. Even the stock market’s all-time highs suggest monetary conditions are not tight. From the Federal Reserve Board of Chicago’s National Financial Conditions Index (NFCI) (follow the black line for ANFCI):

Even the hand-wringing this year from the Federal Reserve about resilient inflation implies that policy may not be restrictive enough (whether that means rate hikes, or, more likely, extending the time horizon for current rates).

Resilient Inflation

Powell repeated a familiar refrain about inflation not falling as fast as expected given presumed restrictive policy. Thus, Powell had to show deference to the possibility that today’s high rates will need to stay in place longer than expected:

“The first quarter in the United States was notable for its lack of further progress on inflation. We had higher readings in the first quarter, higher than we expected. We did not expect this to be a smooth road, but these were higher than I think anybody expected. So, what that has told us is that we’ll need to be patient and let restrictive policy do its work.”

This comment tells me rate cuts are nowhere on the horizon. Moreover, Powell noted “we have the highest interest rates in some time. It may be that it takes longer than expected to do its work and bring inflation down.”

Most telling were Powell’s words when a question offered the opportunity to reassure the market that rate cuts were still on the way. Emphasis mine:

“So, as I just mentioned, I do think it’s really a question of keeping policy at the current rate for a longer time than had been thought. By many measures, the policy rate is restrictive. The question is, is it sufficiently restrictive? And I think that’s going to be a question that time will have to tell. Entertain the possibility? That could be a very small probability, but I have said that I don’t think it’s likely based on the data that we have that the next move we make would be a rate hike. I think it’s more likely that we’ll be at a place where we hold the policy rate where it is.”

Note what Powell did NOT say: it’s more likely that rates will be lower by the end of the year (or even next year).

So, nowhere in the discussion did Powell provide a line for the market expect rate cuts anytime soon. Thus, he has primed the market to get excited about any soft data that could provide the seeds of an excuse for the Fed to cut rates. Powell’s positioning is made even more potent by the stock market’s ability to trade at all-time highs despite all the hand-wringing about inflation this year.

Inflation Forecast

Powell expressed a lot of uncertainty about the path for inflation despite his confidence that “we will do that, that we will get inflation down to 2%.” I am not sure how rate cuts help bring down inflation (Turkey sure learned a central bank cannot cut rates to lower inflation), so I have to assume Powell has an image of “higher for longer” monetary policy rates.

Responding to a question on whether inflation could end up being more persistent than expected, Powell said: “I think we need more than a quarter’s worth of data to really make a judgment on that.” It’s like the perpetual data delay. It will be interesting to hear whether April’s inflation data finally gives the Fed more confidence that inflation is coming down sustainably. Time is running out for the Fed to start telegraphing the first rate cut, so the pressure is on the Fed to spin a story about April and May inflation that points to the 2% target.

When I look a the core CPI graph (year-over-year percentage change in the price index), it looks like inflation will soon resume a steep descent. To apply a modicum of extra rigor, I ran a simplistic forecast through ChatPGT’s Data Analyst. I let the model pick its forecasting method. This is a very simplistic forecast because it only uses the aggregate CPI time series. A more accurate forecast would consist of aggregating the forecasts of individual components of core CPI.

I provided the model core CPI (measured year-over-year) data back to 2016. I wanted the model to surmise that “equilibrium” consists of a tight range for inflation. I did not provide any more data because I figured the further away history gets from the pandemic era, the less likely the model has any value (another downside of using a single, aggregated time series for the forecast).

The chart below combines the actual core CPI data with the forecast. The “funnel” around the forecast shows the confidence interval within which inflation will fall in the future at 95% certainty. The wide swath of possibilities is consistent with Powell’s uncertainty about the path ahead. The flat average forecast is a typical behavior of time series forecasting where there are no definitive seasonal effects detected or modeled future episodic events. (For you ChatGPT and statistics wonks, I provide an Appendix below where ChatGPT explains the model and justifies its approach).

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: All Items Less Food and Energy in U.S. City Average [CPILFESL], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; May 15, 2024.

The Bond Market Rules

Putting aside vain attempts to forecast future inflation, the bond market is the ultimate arbiter of inflation expectations and/or how inflation may impact interest rates. The bond market in the form of the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF is at a very critical (technical) juncture. The downtrend in TLT (uptrend in rates) was the ultimate guide in pushing the market into its April correction. The rebound in stocks for May perfectly correlates with the rebound in TLT (lower rates). The “soft” April CPI report sent TLT up 1.4% and right up against the top of the downtrend channel.

iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (Source: TradingView.com)

A confirmed breakout with a higher close should open the floodgates of bullishness for the stock market. A failure at resistance from the upper part of the channel could trigger a false breakout for the indices. Thus, given this year’s correlation with stocks, I reloaded on TLT puts as a hedge on my long trading positions.

Overall, the lesson in all these dynamics is that inflation combined with the interest rate response should continue to dominate the market’s underlying narrative. With rates on hold, even the Fed is just along for the ride for now.

Be careful out there!

Appendix (ChatGPT explains and justifies the CPI forecast)

{the following is verbatim including ChatGPT’s musings on data types and fixing its own processing problems}

The data consists of monthly core CPI year-over-year percentage changes starting from January 2016. To project the CPI for the next 24 months, I will use the ARIMA (AutoRegressive Integrated Moving Average) model, which is well-suited for time series forecasting.

Justification for ARIMA Model:

1. Handling Trends and Seasonality: ARIMA can model both trend and seasonality in the data, which is crucial for accurate CPI forecasting.
2. Flexibility: The model can be adjusted to different time series characteristics through its parameters.
3. Proven Effectiveness: ARIMA has been widely used and tested in economic and financial forecasting, making it a reliable choice.

Steps for the Analysis:

1. Data Preparation: Convert the date column to a datetime format and set it as the index.
2. Stationarity Check: Perform tests to check if the time series is stationary. If not, apply differencing.
3. Model Identification: Use autocorrelation (ACF) and partial autocorrelation (PACF) plots to identify the order of the ARIMA model.
4. Model Estimation: Fit the ARIMA model to the data.
5. Forecasting: Generate forecasts for the next 24 months.
6. Confidence Intervals: Calculate confidence intervals for the forecasts.
7. Visualization: Plot the actual data, the forecasted values, and the confidence intervals.

Let’s start with the data preparation and initial analysis. ​​

The Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) test results are as follows:

• ADF Statistic: -0.988
• p-value: 0.758
• Critical Values:
  • 1%: -3.508
  • 5%: -2.895
  • 10%: -2.585

Since the p-value is greater than 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis that the time series is non-stationary. This indicates that the series needs to be differenced to make it stationary.

Let’s apply first-order differencing and recheck for stationarity. ​​

The ADF test results after first-order differencing are as follows:

• ADF Statistic: -2.447
• p-value: 0.129
• Critical Values:
  • 1%: -3.509
  • 5%: -2.896
  • 10%: -2.585

The p-value is still greater than 0.05, indicating the time series is not yet stationary. Let’s apply second-order differencing. ​​

The ADF test results after second-order differencing are as follows:

• ADF Statistic: -2.843
• p-value: 0.052
• Critical Values:
  • 1%: -3.509
  • 5%: -2.896
  • 10%: -2.585

The p-value is now close to 0.05, indicating the time series is approaching stationarity. Since it’s marginally above the threshold, we will proceed with ARIMA modeling with second-order differencing.

Model Identification

Next, we’ll use ACF and PACF plots to identify the appropriate orders (p, d, q) for the ARIMA model. ​​

The ACF and PACF plots provide insights into the appropriate orders for the ARIMA model:

• ACF (Autocorrelation Function): The ACF plot shows significant lags at various points, suggesting that an MA component (q) might be needed.
• PACF (Partial Autocorrelation Function): The PACF plot shows significant lags at the beginning, suggesting that an AR component (p) might be necessary.

Given the plots, an ARIMA model with orders (p, d, q) will be selected. Based on visual inspection, we can start with ARIMA(2, 2, 2) since both ACF and PACF show significance up to lag 2.

Model Estimation

Let’s fit the ARIMA(2, 2, 2) model to the data and generate forecasts for the next 24 months. ​​

It seems there’s an issue with the data types in the forecast confidence intervals, which might be causing the error. Let’s inspect the forecasted values and the confidence intervals to identify the problem. ​​

The forecasted values and confidence intervals appear to be valid. The issue might be due to incorrect data handling during the plotting process.

To resolve this, let’s explicitly convert the confidence intervals to a numeric type before plotting. ​​

It appears the error persists despite converting the confidence intervals to float. This might be due to a mismatch in the indices of the forecast intervals and the forecasted mean.

To resolve this, I’ll ensure the indices of the confidence intervals match those of the forecasted mean before plotting. ​​

The issue may be due to an incompatibility between the data types of the forecast index and the confidence intervals. To resolve this, I will ensure all data is in the correct numeric format and use the correct plotting function.

I’ll convert all relevant data to the same data type and then re-plot. ​​

The plot now correctly displays the actual data, the forecast, and the confidence intervals.

Summary of Analysis and Forecast:

• Data Preparation: The time series data was checked for stationarity and transformed using differencing to achieve stationarity.
• Model Selection: Based on the ACF and PACF plots, an ARIMA(2, 2, 2) model was chosen.
• Model Fitting and Forecasting: The ARIMA model was fit to the data, and forecasts for the next 24 months were generated.
• Visualization: The actual data, forecasted values, and confidence intervals were plotted to provide a comprehensive view of the projected CPI.

This approach provides a robust forecast by incorporating both autoregressive and moving average components, accounting for trends and seasonality in the core CPI data. The confidence intervals offer a range of possible future values, helping to understand the uncertainty associated with the predictions.

Full disclosure: long SPY calendar call spread, long TLT puts

The post Fed’s Powell Avoids Rate Cut Talk While April CPI Keeps Hope Alive appeared first on Inflation Watch.

I am tempted to say financial markets have already done the Fed’s work. However, it is very likely that the minute the Federal Reserve even hints that rate cuts could be delayed until next year, the resulting tantrum in financial markets could be epic. The Fed is loathe to disappoint markets, and the message from the last meeting and subsequently from Jerome Powell has been to promise a rate cut sooner than later. Financial markets have persistently focused on any and all dovish twinges in Fed-related pronouncements. For example, from Powell’s testimony to Congress on March 6th (emphasis mine):

“We believe that our policy rate is likely at its peak for this tightening cycle. If the economy evolves broadly as expected, it will likely be appropriate to begin dialing back policy restraint at some point this year. But the economic outlook is uncertain, and ongoing progress toward our 2 percent inflation objective is not assured. Reducing policy restraint too soon or too much could result in a reversal of progress we have seen in inflation and ultimately require even tighter policy to get inflation back to 2 percent. At the same time, reducing policy restraint too late or too little could unduly weaken economic activity and employment.”

Powell can insert all the standard caveats he wants. Markets read this statement as saying rate cuts are on their way!

A Nervous Bond Market

Yet, bond markets have been a little “nervous” all year. For example, the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has trended downward (meaning higher bond yields) so far this year with lower highs and lower lows. From TradingView:

TLT is just a fresh low of the year away from finally catching the stock market’s attention again.

Copper, Lumber, and Oil – oh my!

The bond market has good reason for some jitters. Several commodities have sprung back to life this year. Copper miner Freeport-McMoRan Inc (FCX) is welcoming the upcoming Fed meeting with a 7+ month high. FCX is up 19.8% in less than two weeks. (FCX has been stuck in a trading range since the beginning of 2021).

Lumber bottomed out in early 2023. This month, lumber broke out above last summer’s high and is back to levels last seen in August, 2022.

Oil, everyone’s favorite non-core component of inflation, has been in “stealth” rally mode all year. The United States Oil Fund, LP (USO) looks ready to launch parabolically on the wings of rate cuts.

Where will these prices go with rate cuts? I vote higher.

The Golden Touch

Speaking of getting ready for rate cuts, gold, my favorite hedge enjoyed a spectacular (and overdue) breakout this month. SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) traded at an all-time high at its peak this month.

I like buying the dips in GLD going forward. The odds seem sufficiently high for the Fed to feel “forced” into easing into a sea of market liquidity.

Straining to See the Weakness in Labor Markets

So maybe the Fed can strain its economic gaze and find an excuse to do a “proactive” rate cut. The graph below shows the unemployment rate has likely bottomed out (left axis and blue line) Yet, it remains near historic lows. Initial unemployment claims have been trendless with a recent peak set last summer (right axis and green line). Finally, real GDP quarter-over-quarter growth has levitated in positive territory and for the last two years has defied overly persistent expectations for a recession (right axis and red line). From my perch, I see no excuse for a rate cut here, but perhaps I am not creative enough with the data.

Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Unemployment Rate [UNRATE], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; U.S. Employment and Training Administration, Initial Claims [ICSA], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Real Gross Domestic Product [GDPC1], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.

The Stock Market’s Giddy Anticipation

The stock market’s giddy anticipation of rate cuts is poetic. The stock market has soared on loosening financial conditions and has been able to ignore just about any bad news the macro environment tries to toss out there. Recent successive all-time highs speak volumes to the buffer the Fed can enjoy if it so chooses to wait out the Presidential election before making changes to monetary policy.

Conclusion

With market breadth increasingly lagging the stock market’s ascension, I have been a skeptic about the overall rally for several weeks. The Federal Reserve is probably the last catalyst between now and the Presidential election that has a chance of validating my skepticism. If the Fed complies with the market’s giddiness, there is no telling how high the market could soar in coming months. If the Fed decides to wait things out, the stock market will lose a major contributor to the upward and higher fund. Then again, maybe the Fed pulls off a magical “hawkish rate cut” (one and done rate cut with a warning about the potential for inflation to rise from the ashes). The Fed could figure out just the right balance between disappointing the stock market and fueling ever increasing levels of speculation and higher commodity prices…

Be careful out there!

Full disclosure: long GLD

The post Financial Conditions Make A Monetary Roundtrip and Undercut the Need for Rate Cuts appeared first on Inflation Watch.

Jordan set the stage for his market-moving statements in welcoming remarks at the SNB-FRB-BIS High-Level Conference on Global Risk, Uncertainty, and Volatility, November 8-9, 2022 titled “Decision-making under uncertainty: The importance of pragmatism, consistency and determination.” In the speech, Thomas declared “determined action today is consistent with our resolute response to deflationary pressures in the past.” In other words, the SNB is resolute in its inflation-fighting mission and rates will continue higher.

The speech set out a clear blueprint for how the SNB conducts monetary policy in this inflationary environment. The SNB wields an impressive variety of tools that basically says the SNB knows more about inflation than you. Here is a bulleted summary:

• Disaggregated CPI data
• A “network of regional representatives who conduct one-on-one discussions about the current economic situation in Switzerland with around 250 company managers throughout the country every quarter.” The SNB collects data on inflation expectations and changes in price-setting behavior.
• Model simulations and forecasting
• Risk assessments and cost-benefit analyses
• Machine-learning models trained on “a large set of economic and alternative indicators” (in an experimentation phase)

This list is a helpful guide for judging counter-observations about inflation from various pundits (including me!).

The SNB’s developing approaches to fighting inflation are not just based on stacks of data and layers of models. The SNB is also grounded by a set of principles. Jordan launched a description of these principals with two rhetorical questions:

“How do policymakers handle this situation of high uncertainty, upside risks to inflation and limited reliability of forecasts? How do they decide when and how strongly to tighten monetary policy?”

The SNB approaches this challenge with a risk management approach. The principles of pragmatism, consistency, and determination orient the SNB’s thinking. Pragmatism requires “policies that exhibit a certain degree of robustness to different circumstances.” Consistency generates monetary policy “…based on a firm commitment to the objective of price stability” that systematically uses all available information. Determination requires “…decisive action…[because] at times, the optimal policy decisions may be those that provide insurance against particularly bad, though very unlikely, events.” Jordan cautioned that “mixed signals on the persistence of inflation might tempt policymakers to postpone further reaction to inflationary pressures until uncertainty about future inflation has receded.” In other words, the damaging risks to inflation are high enough to warrant aggressive action ahead of high degrees of certainty. (The U.S. Federal Reserve deals with this conundrum by relying on the ability to quickly reverse course if monetary policy proves to be too tight).

The SNB’s determination provides the environment or the context for how the SNB decided to finally lift rates out of negative territory. The change started late last year as the SNB “began to tolerate a certain nominal appreciation of the Swiss franc.” The SNB started raising rates in June “to counter the risk of a further build-up of inflationary pressures.” Going forward, the market should expect a combination: higher rates and a stronger Swiss franc.

The Trade

Given these pronouncements, I removed my bias to fade the Swiss franc on rallies. Now, I have a bias to go long. I started with a small short position on EUR/CHF that I plan to grow over time. I will also buy the dips on FXF.

Be careful out there!

Full disclosure: short EUR/CHF

The post The Swiss National Bank Knows More About Inflation Than You appeared first on Inflation Watch.

For example, back in April, 2022, Richard Corbin, a research professor at the University of Michigan who has directed the consumer sentiment surveys since 1976, issued this ominous warning in describing “inflationary psychology”:

“There is a high probability that a self-perpetuating wage-price spiral will develop in the next few years. Households have already become less resistant to paying higher prices and firms have become less resistant to offering higher wages. Prices and wages will continue to spiral upward until the cumulative erosion in inflation-adjusted incomes causes the economy to collapse in recession…

…Although consumers have increasingly expected higher inflation, they have also expected a strong job market and rising wages, especially among consumers under age 45. In the year ahead, wage gains will continue to reduce resistance to rising prices among consumers, and the ability of firms to easily raise their selling prices will continue to reduce their resistance to increasing wages. Thus, the essential ingredients of a self-perpetuating wage-price spiral are now in place: rising inflation accompanied by rising wages.”

“Inflationary Psychology Has Set In. Dislodging It Won’t Be Easy” – Richard Corbin

Note well that the University of Michigan’s U.S. consumer sentiment survey showed 1-year inflation expectations last peaked in March at 5.4%. There have been encouraging signs from the subsequent drift downward. However, hopes were dashed that these numbers could convince the Fed to pause after October’s 1-year expectation of 5.1% delivered a significant jump from September’s 4.7%. In other words, at best, expectations may be stabilizing at high levels, especially with core CPI surprising to the upside in September. Note, Corbin warned about over-extrapolating trends from wiggles in inflation numbers:

“Another critical characteristic of the earlier inflation era was frequent temporary reversals in inflation, only to be followed by new peaks. That same pattern should be expected in the months ahead.”

Surveys of Consumers, University of Michigan, University of Michigan: Inflation Expectation© [MICH], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, (Accessed on 10/16/2022, note the data are updated only through August per agreement)

For reference, the 5-year inflation expectations remain just above 2% which indicates consumers are still clinging to confidence that over the “long-term” inflation will return to the “before times”.

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 5-Year, 5-Year Forward Inflation Expectation Rate [T5YIFR], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, October 16, 2022.

Corbin wrote on the heels of the Fed’s first rate hike which was a mere 25 basis points. Corbin reacted with dismay and presciently argued:

“What was perhaps more surprising was that the quarter-point hike the Fed adopted in March was simply too small to signal an aggressive defense against rising inflation. Instead, it signaled the continuation of a strong labor market along with an inflation rate that would continue to rise.

Much more aggressive policy moves against inflation may arouse some controversy. Nonetheless, they are needed.”

Apparently, the Fed got the message and has been aggressively hiking starting with May’s rate hike!

If inflation expectations remain stubbornly elevated, then the time when the Fed is finally forced to take a pause could present a critical juncture of economic tension. In this scenario, I expect those who applaud the Fed’s pause will dismiss on-going high inflation expectations as transitory or even uninformed. Watch out if those expectations achieve new highs in the wake of a Fed pause.

The current controversy about aggressive policy demonstrates an instructive contrast with the last tightening cycle. What a difference pace can make! The S&P 500 (SPY) (red line with scale on the right) had little problem drifting higher while the Fed tightened with baby steps from 2016 to 2018. A sharp correction in late 2018 helped to convince the Fed to pause and then bring rates down. Market participants are still waiting for the Fed to care about the current market sell-off in the wake of higher rates.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (US), Federal Funds Effective Rate [FEDFUNDS], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, S&P 500 [SP500], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, October 17, 2022 (data available through September 1, 2022)

Be careful out there!

Full disclosure: short SPY put spread

The post Inflation Expectations and Inflationary Psychology appeared first on Inflation Watch.

ARK Invest’s Cathie Wood has opposed the Federal Reverse since at least the time the U.S. central bank first hiked rates above zero. Just three weeks after the Fed’s first interest rate hike, with more promised, Wood warned the Fed was making a mistake. On April 2nd, Wood jumped on a market signal from the inversion of the yield curve to underline the point.

The inversion barely lasted 2 days. The yield curve quickly “reverted” for the next 3 months and threw wrenches into the prognostications of a Wall Street looking for a recession to stop the Fed in its tracks. The yield curve inverted again in early July and has yet to look back. Yet, the Fed has become increasingly hawkish even in the face of this traditional signal of a recession. The Fed’s resolution was epitomized by a curt speech at Jackson Hole where Chair Jay Powell stood resolute on the Fed’s inflation fighting mantra.

So it is no surprise that Wood recently opened a new salvo in her campaign against the Fed’s monetary policy by writing an “open letter to the Fed” to extend her latest criticism in her videocast “In the Know.” In this letter, Wood warns that the Fed is overly focused on lagging indicators from inflation and employment and cannot see the “deflationary bust” that awaits the other side of its aggressive monetary tightening. In many ways, a deflationary bust has already occurred in financial markets. For example, Wood’s flagship fund The ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) is just a “day’s trade” away from returning to its pandemic lows. Those sudden March, 2020 lows came on the heels of an economic and market crash that was full-force deflation until monetary and fiscal stimulus saved the day.

A Deflation Is Already Here

In other words, the deflation that Wood fears has already unfolded in certain financial markets. That pain is felt by anyone invested in the stock market. That pain runs even deeper for those speculating in the companies uncomfortably jostling around in the collection of ARK funds. However, Wood’s letter does not point to prices in her funds. Instead, the letter relies on a series of economic readings showing peak prices and subsequent declines for gold, silver, lumber, iron ore, DRAM, shipping, copper, corn, oil, and container board. The letter points out the ballooning inventories at major U.S. retailers and elements of employment data that show the first signs of a hot labor market finally beginning to cool.

All this complaining across Wall Street and all these data of course beg the question: why is the Fed ignoring it all? However, I think this question is misplaced. For example, Mary Daly, head of the San Francisco Fed, insisted that the Fed is forward looking. She even scolded the market is wrong in expecting rate cuts in 2023. The Fed has hundreds of economists on staff, including the ones who help to curate the charts from the St Louis Fed that I used to show the yield curve inversion. They know everything and more than the economists who get all the attention in the media. So I think it is a stretch to conclude that the Fed has no idea what is going on.

Why the Fed Won’t Read Cathie Wood’s Letter: Speculating on the Fed’s (Unstated) Strategy

Instead, I look to the larger, strategic context. The Fed kept rates too low for too long: the mania in the housing market and stratospheric valuations of profitless companies (again, see the ARK Funds) are sufficient evidence that the Fed should have started the journey toward normalization earlier. Moreover, the Fed has a massive $9 trillion dollar balance sheet that represents a considerable share of the $20 trillion U.S. economy. My guess is the Fed is not hearing the whispers of the famous inflation fighter, former Fed Chair Paul Volcker. Instead, the Fed recognizes the layers of distortions it helped to create in the economy, and it desperately wants to hit the reset button. From the purview of neutral to slightly restrictive policy, it can THEN observe the impact and assess whether the economy can sustain the resulting damage. I also guess that the Fed fully recognizes that the very minute markets sniff a peak in monetary tightening, speculative forces will roar away. Just watch what happens to the ARK Funds in that moment. Indeed, when Wood expected the Fed to cry uncle in July, she anticipated a vindicating resurgence in the ARK Funds.

In this environment where financial markets have become accustomed to easy money and have little experience dealing with inflationary pressures, the Fed is forced to err on the side of being aggressively hawkish as long as it dares possible. The Fed needs to make sure that when the time comes to pause and observe, little to no inflationary embers are left smoldering, ready to reignite with the giddy anticipation of easy money days to come again. As long as employment remains robust and resilient, the Fed can maintain political support for its actions even as support from market participants plummets. The rush to get to neutral or past neutral is likely exactly because the employment window cannot remain open to the Fed for an extended period. The Fed’s actions suggest a strategy for finishing hikes by the time the labor market’s weakness is obvious through an uptrend in the unemployment rate. The Fed has shown itself unmoved by losses in financial markets. So, pundits can throw all the macroeconomic tomatoes they want, the Fed is in over-correction mode for now.

Clinging to the ARK

When the bottom fell out of the ARK Funds, I updated my technical assessment and trading strategy on each of the major funds. I continue to think that the technicals are much more important than the fundamentals here. While the inverse correlation between interest rates and ARK performance is fundamental (surely much to Wood’s chagrin), the technicals of trend-following are sufficient for making trades. At some point, rates WILL peak. I contend the technicals (of trading on extremes) will actually become even MORE important then. Who knows what will be left standing in the ARK funds by that point…

Be careful out there!

Full disclosure: long ARK

The post Why the Fed Won’t Read Cathie Wood’s Open Letter appeared first on Inflation Watch.

The Fed’s core concern comes from the out-sized influence of housing services on the PCE (Personal Consumption Expenditures): “Given that housing services constitutes the largest subcomponent of PCE, accounting for roughly 18% of total consumption expenditures, the impact of housing services inflation on overall PCE inflation is always significant.” In other words, I interpret the Fed’s recent religion on normalizing interest policy as a belated attempt to cool down price appreciation in the housing market.

The St. Louis Fed also put this concern in context by comparing today’s inflation with the inflation from the last economic expansion from July 2010 to January 2020. Interestingly each of the three components of the PCE – durable goods, non-durable goods, and services – have contributed around the same amount of extra inflationary pressure in absolute terms, ranging from 1.46 to 1.71 percentage points. However, with a 65% of total consumption expenditures, the promise of on-going upward pressure on services inflation promises to drive the overall PCE ever higher. The Fed finally could no longer sit still on rates.

(For a good read on belated inflation concerns, review Jason Furman’s critique of the economics profession: “Why Did Almost Nobody See Inflation Coming?“)

Be careful out there!

Full disclosure: no positions

The post The Federal Reserve Fears On-Going Inflationary Pressures from Rents appeared first on Inflation Watch.