In his speech at the annual Jackson Hole confab, Powell acknowledged that “with policy in restrictive territory, the baseline outlook and the shifting balance of risks may warrant adjusting our policy stance” (emphasis mine). In normal times, with this ever so slight tweak in Powell’s inclinations and probabilities coming at the end of a long explanation of the balance of risks to inflation, employment, and the economy, this concession could be interpreted as another tease in the on-going suspense and fight over rate cuts. Instead, a stock market ever more eager for rate cuts built a temple from a single stair step and responded with one of the biggest expansions in market breadth that I have ever seen.

Maintaining high odds of a September rate cut will effectively force the Fed to cut. However, if Powell stays on message – “monetary policy is not on a preset course” – then the September rate cut could easily lead to a major disappointment. The Fed’s voting majority may not be ready to promise a sustained rate cutting cycle because inflation remains a nagging problem for the Fed.

Even before the tariff drama, trauma, and noise, inflation was proving itself sticky and stubborn. Now, core CPI (Consumer Price Index) and core PCE (Personal Consumption Expenditures), the Fed’s preferred inflation measure, look like they have bottomed. Core CPI has even started heading upward largely thanks to a lift in services inflation. As a result, not only is the Fed looking to cut rates well short of its 2% (core PCE) target but also just as inflation’s downtrend is taking an extended pause.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Personal Consumption Expenditures Excluding Food and Energy (Chain-Type Price Index) [PCEPILFE], retrieved from FRED; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: All Items Less Food and Energy in U.S. City Average [CPILFESL], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, August 25, 2025.

A suddenly very hot Producer Price Index (PPI) from July promises that subsequent CPI reads will not deliver inflation relief.

Moreover, tariff-driven inflation is already showing up both in the anecdotes from business leaders, earnings reports, and the Fed’s own research. Moreover, even though the Fed Funds rate is still in restrictive territory, financial conditions are not tight. In fact, financial conditions were last this loose right before the Fed belatedly started hiking rates in early 2022.

All together, these stories provide cautionary tales for rate cuts. The confidence I observe in the “rate-cutters” shows insufficient deference to the stagflationary possibilities in the economy. Powell characterized the potential as “a challenging situation” after he finished explaining how “in the near term, risks to inflation are tilted to the upside, and risks to employment to the downside”. This position between a rock and a hard place motivates me to tighten my grip on my position in Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP).

A Swirl Of Claims and Counterclaims

At this point, every one has an opinion on what the Fed needs to do. I have taken note of some key interviews and speeches to portray the painful complexity of the task ahead for the Federal Reserve. Anyone who claims with confidence that the Fed should do “X” is glossing over some part of this picture.

Cleveland President Beth Hammack Leans Against A Rate Cut

Interviews like the one with Cleveland President Beth Hammack formed part of the reason the stock market got caught leaning away from Powell’s first step on the stairs of hopeful monetary policy. A day before Powell’s speech, Hammack insisted that “with the data in hand right now, if the meeting was tomorrow, I would not see a case for reducing interest rates”. She warned that her “biggest concern is that inflation has been too high for the past 4 years. And right now it has been trending in the wrong direction [see chart above]. It’s important we stay modestly restrictive to make sure inflation is brought back under control” (Hammack’s predecessor expressed similar concerns earlier in the month).

Hammack also worried that the inflationary impact of tariffs are just getting started and will continue into Q1 and Q2 of next year given the timing of contract renewals. These worries did not sound like the setup for an incrementally conciliatory Powell.

Hammack also stated that “financial conditions are broadly supportive of the economy” (consistent with the ANFCI). Moreover, she is “not hearing interest rates are a huge problem”. The builders and businesses building new plants in Hammack’s district are complaining just as much about the cost of materials and labor as they are about high interest rates. In a case for future inflationary pressures, manufacturers in the Cleveland district have been buffering price increases but cannot not sustain the hits “forever”.

I surmise Hammack will vote against a rate hike in September. Will she suddenly find herself on the dissenting side of the ledger?

Former St. Louis Fed President Jim Bullard Bolsters Candidacy As Next Fed Chair

Candidates for position of the next Fed Chair share a common trait. They think tariffs will not cause lasting inflation and support cutting rates right away. Former St. Louis Fed President Jim Bullard is a recent add to the candidate list. In a CNBC interview on August 12, Bullard insisted tariffs do not cause inflation. Tariffs are a tax and taxes do not cause inflation (a common equivalence). He pointed to data showing very muted effects and claimed that tariffs are not interrupting the longer-term trend to 2% inflation. Like other supporters of rate cuts, Bullard is looking well beyond the current swirl of data and glancing at the top of the stairs of hopeful monetary policy.

Council of Economic Advisers Chair Stephen Miran Asks “What Inflation”?

Council of Economic Advisers Chair Stephen Miran is also on the list of potential candidates to next head the Fed. Miran appeared on CNBC the same day as Bullard to discuss the economy. By narrowing his view to inflation since inauguration, Miran calculated a 1.9% annualized rate of inflation (I assume this was a reference to headline inflation). He further insisted that there “continues to be no evidence whatsoever of tariff-induced inflation”, and he implied that there will be no evidence for future impacts either. Ultimately, exporters will bear the cost of tariffs because they are the least flexible part of the supply chain; Americans will just buy elsewhere or make formerly imported goods domestically (do exporting countries doing deals understand their ultimate doom?).

When asked about the bottoming in core inflation, Miran dismissed the dynamic because tariffs are not the culprit. Miran pointed to used cars and airfares as core drivers. He went on to finger illegal immigration for boosting rents by 4-5%. Thus, net services inflation will go to zero because of the current crackdown on illegal residency.

Miran stands confidently at the top of the stairs of hopeful monetary policy. I am guessing he is a front-runner in the race for Fed Chair.

Gold Paralyzed With Indecision?

The price of gold has largely stopped responding to the back and forth in inflation-related data and opinions on monetary policy. While the SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) increased 1.1% in the wake of Powell’s first step on the stairs of hopeful monetary policy, GLD remains firmly stuck in a 4-month trading range. A technical “bearish engulfing” pattern in April continues to loom over the trading action as a top. Still, I am betting on GLD responding bullishly to the next rate cut just as it did to the last one. GLD is up 30% after initially selling off in response to what was thought to be a hawkish rate cut at the time.

I have been holding a GLD calendar call spread for the last half or so of this trading range while rolling forward the expiring short ends of the spread. I plan to convert this position to an outright call spread ahead of the September Fed meeting.

Be careful out there!

The post Powell Places His First Step On the Stairs Of Hopeful Monetary Policy appeared first on Inflation Watch.

Tariffs Create Inflation Risk

While the administration goes back and forth on whether tariffs will create price increases, Powell is quite clear: “If the large increases in tariffs that have been announced are sustained, they are likely to generate a rise in inflation”. Powell further warned that these large tariffs will also likely lead to “a slowdown in economic growth, and an increase in unemployment”. This cocktail is the very definition of stagflation. Powell reinforced his implicit plea to end the tariff war by repeating his warnings during the Q&A session. For example, he emphasized that “given the scope and scale of the tariffs…certainly the risk to higher inflation, higher unemployment have increased.” As a result, the Fed “won’t see further progress toward our goals, but we might see a delay in that.”

To add credibility to the concerns, Powell referenced the consensus (emphasis mine): “If you look at where forecasters are, they’re all forecasting an increase in inflation.” Without admitting he fears the potential of a recession, Powell followed up by referencing “forecasts of weakening in the economy and some have recession forecast.”

Thus, if Powell was in charge of trade policy, he would not go down the current path of large tariff increases. The risks to inflation and of a weaker economy – aka stagflation – are too great.

These admonishments are made more remarkable given the on-going (and one-way) spat that President Trump has with Powell. Trump now calls the Fed Chair “too late Powell”. Trump piled on by calling Powell a fool after the latest stall on rate cuts. I suspect Trump sees the hidden messages in Powell’s commentary.

Waiting As Leverage

Given the standoff in risks, the Fed has no choice but to sit on the sidelines of policy. Firstly, the trade policies are uncertain and in flux. During the current 90-day pause, anything can happen, including a sudden collapse in the ceasefire or another 90-day pause to avoid all-out economic warfare. Once these uncertainties clear up, the Fed next must wait to see impact from the policies before it can venture to take action.

Yet, I think the Fed would be cutting rates if not for the tariff risks. During the Q&A, Powell let slip that the Fed could have been late in cutting rates last year: “I wouldn’t say that what we did last fall was at all preemptive. If anything, it was a little late.” Ironically, the tariff risks will definitely make the Fed late again. By the time the dust settles enough for the Fed to be confident in more rate cuts, the economy could be deep in the throes of weakness.

Still, there is an interesting angle in the Fed’s insistence on waiting. The U.S.’s massive budget deficits need to be financed at lower rates. This more favorable financing likely needs the assistance of the Fed, whether by coaxing the long-end of the bond market to come down with “follow the leader” federal fund rate cuts or something more direct like “Operation Twist.” The longer higher rates persist, the harder it will be for the U.S. to take major fiscal action like extending the massive tax cuts from 2017. Powell has insisted since the first pause on rate cuts that the Fed can afford to wait. In the latest meeting, Powell further emphasized the Fed can afford to wait. I counted 21 times Powell used the word “wait” or “await”, 3 times Powell referenced no need to “hurry”, and another 4 times Powell insisted on exercising patience. I see a Fed in stagflation planning mode when Powell insists “for the time being, we are well positioned to wait for greater clarity before considering any adjustments to our policy stance.”

The message to the White House? Provide clarity post haste. All this waiting is the Federal Reserve’s way of exercising leverage while disavowing interest in advising on policy.

Markets React: The Dollar, Gold, and Bond Yields

After the Federal Reserve’s statement, the U.S. dollar strengthened, gold weakened, and long-term bond yields went higher for the rest of the week.

The U.S. dollar index (DXY) is still rebounding off a 3-year low. So for now I am assuming that the dollar’s strength for the rest of the week was a residual from this bounce from “oversold conditions”. Currency traders are likely waiting for the next dramatic tariff headlines to resume selling the dollar. (I currently hold a mix of long and short dollar bets). The weekly chart below shows that at the peak of the tariff trauma and drama that the dollar index reached a level last seen in March, 2022.

Gold is even more intriguing. The SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) went on a near parabolic run for a week and a half in April. Such runs usually come to climactic ends. In GLD’s case, a bearish engulfing topping pattern signaled the end of the run. GLD attempted a rebound from support at its 20-day moving average (DMA) (the dotted line below), but it stopped cold right at its all-time high. Fed day brought GLD right back down to its 20DMA support. I suspect this support will eventually give way as the Fed’s latest insistence on patience translates into a slightly lower enthusiasm in buying gold as a hedge against a Fed forced to cut rates right into the teeth of tariff-driven inflationary pressures. Waning enthusiasm is likely only worth a test of uptrending 50DMA support (the red line).

Long-term rates have chopped around since December. However, based on the “heavy” technicals for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT), rates look poised to head higher at some point. TLT is just one more bout of economic chaos away from a fresh swoosh downward. The lows of the year coincided with levels last seen in November, 2023.

Stuck Until Further Notice

By the time of the next Fed meeting in June, we should have a better idea about the success or lack thereof for the 90-day tariff pause. The pressure will only increase on Powell to speak clarity into monetary policy. If more economic and sentiment indicators are flagging increasing stagflationary pressures while trade policy remains uncertain, I expect Powell to get more strident in his warnings (in Powell’s mild-mannered way of course). In the meantime, the stock market looks poised to join the Federal Reserve in getting stuck. The S&P 500 (SPY) is in a cliffhanger trading right below 200DMA resistance for the month of May.

Be careful out there!

The post Powell’s (Not So) Hidden Plea to End the U.S.’s Tariff War appeared first on Inflation Watch.

As the stock market has careened into a bear market amid growing economic anxieties and uncertainties, financial markets have started to return to the old standby to save the day: interest rate cuts from the Federal Reserve. Expectations have definitively brought forward the timing for the next rate cut from July to June. The table below the chart of the market’s target probabilities for the June Fed meeting show the change in probabilities starting one month ago. The odds for the Fed maintaining its target rate range at 4.25% to 4.5% have plunged from 49.6% a month ago to 18.3% a week ago and 18.8% yesterday. While those odds moved slightly higher to 23.1% as of the time of writing, the odds for a 25 basis point cut still increased from 56.2% to 58.1% from yesterday to now.

Of course, if the market continues to roil and sink deeper into a bear market, financial markets may become too restless with a June timetable. However, as we saw last year, just the expectation for imminent rate cuts can be enough to keep spirits lifted in financial markets.

Even if the Fed wants to placate markets and play its modern role as market hero, consumer’s rising expectations for inflation should force the Fed to remain patient and measured. March’s preliminary read for the Surveys of Consumers from the University of Michigan showed yet another increase for both short-term and long-term inflation expectations. There is already a definite upward trend in long-run expectations and short-run expectations soared. From the University of Michigan:

“Year-ahead inflation expectations jumped up from 4.3% last month to 4.9% this month, the highest reading since November 2022 and marking three consecutive months of unusually large increases of 0.5 percentage points or more. This month’s rise was seen across all three political affiliations. Long-run inflation expectations surged from 3.5% in February to 3.9% in March. This is the largest month-over-month increase seen since 1993, stemming from a sizable rise among Independents, and followed an already-large increase in February.”

In parallel with the troubling trends on inflation expectations, consumer’s expectations for more unemployment are soaring. Take together, consumers are increasingly fearing a stagflationary economic environment.

Thus, the Fed faces maximum pressure. No matter what the Fed decides or says in next week’s decision on monetary policy, major disappointment and/or jitters are bound to rise from some significant portion of observers. In turn, elevated volatility could remain elevated and translate into more pressure on stock prices. Either the Fed will be taken to task for changing a re-ignition of realized inflationary pressures, or the Fed will be criticized moving too slowly to stave off a recession.

For now volatility is calming down as fears of a government shutdown subside…

…even as one of my favorite investments and trades, SPDR Gold Trust (GLD), breaks out to fresh all-time highs.

Be careful out there!

Full disclosure: long VXX put options, long GLD shares and call spread

The post Maximum Pressure for the Federal Reserve appeared first on Inflation Watch.

The stock market woke up the next day after the Producer Price Index (PPI) came in hot and suggested once again that underlying price pressures in the economy continue to increase. The S&P 500 gapped down and lost 0.5%. More importantly, TLT lost another 1.2% and confirmed a breakdown below its 50-day moving average (DMA). The core PPI, Final Demand Less Foods and Energy, has trended upwards all year and is now at its highest level since February, 2023 at 3.5%.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Producer Price Index by Commodity: Final Demand: Final Demand Less Foods and Energy [PPIFES], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, December 12, 2024.

Assuming the Federal Reserve cuts rates next week as expected, I am guessing rate cuts will slow to a crawl if not come to an outright halt for the beginning of 2025. Accordingly, the Fed’s communications to the market will get about as tricky as ever. Fortunately for the bulls the market’s momentum carries a large amount of buffer from current Animal Spirits.

iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond (TLT)

The fascinating contrast between stubbornly stable inflation and Fed rate cuts continues to keep me fading rallies in TLT. TLT’s earlier breakout above its 50DMA (the red line below) almost fooled me. TLT is now closing the gap up created by Trump’s pick to head the U.S. Treasury department, Scott Bessent. Assuming that gap closes, a true test of the bottom of the presumed trading range should finally unfold.

Gold

While TLT delivered, gold disappointed. I have a live short-term trade in PHYS and call spreads and call options in SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) that orbits my core long-term position in GLD shares. I was encouraged by GLD’s reaction to the CPI and just assumed the rally would continue into at least the end of this week. Instead, GLD reversed right back to 50DMA support. I do not have a ready hypothesis to explain this seemingly contrarian move. (I would love to hear yours!)

What Happens If the Fed Gets “Hawkish”

The Fed is currently dovish. It would not take much for the Fed to sound hawkish. A firm follow-up to the round of Fedspeak attempting to walk back market expectations for rates cuts could set off the alarm bells for the market. At that point, the short-term GLD trade gets less attractive. TLT will probably still be good for fades. The stock market will likely stall for at least the rest of the Santa rally season….just enough time to find the next reason to reinflate Animal Spirits.

The big wildcard for me in a “more hawkish Fed” scenario is the U.S. dollar. There are multiple countervailing catalysts that make the U.S. dollar attractive and unattractive. Thus, it is hard to develop conviction beyond the short-term technicals. Right now, I still like fading the euro against the U.S. dollar. At the same time, I finally gave up trying to catch a pullback in USD/CAD, a strengthening in the Canadian dollar (Invesco CurrencyShares Canadian Dollar Trust (FXC)). I am now playing the major breakout to the long side. USD/CAD is practically making a beeline to test a critical long-term double-top spanning 2016 and 2020.

Be careful out there!

Full disclosure: long USD/CAD, short EUR/USD: long GLD shares, calls, and call spread; long PHYS, long TLT puts

The post Bonds Try to Weigh on A Market Trying Harder to Look Past Stabilizing Inflation appeared first on Inflation Watch.