Shmid warned that “while in theory, tariffs may have only temporary effects on inflation (although persistent effects on the level of prices) I would be hesitant to take too much solace from theory in this environment”. He tied recent tariff announcements to broader signs of economic stress, including “a decline in consumer sentiment and increases in near-term inflation expectations.” Schmid acknowledged that the current policy environment has become “considerably more complicated,” citing feedback from business contacts who see growing risks on both sides of the Fed’s dual mandate of maximum employment and stable prices.

Schmid’s skepticism around transitory inflation contrasts with recent remarks from Fed Chair Jerome Powell, who has leaned into a more reassuring message about the persistence of tariff-driven price pressures. In “Jerome Powell’s Fed Deftly Maneuvers Through a Stagflationary Minefield“, I admired Powell’s effectiveness in navigating a difficult policy landscape, but I also pointed out the problematic use of “transitory” to describe inflationary effects. Powell argued that “it can be the case that it’s appropriate sometimes to look through inflation if it’s going to go away quickly without action by us… and that can be the case in the case of tariff inflation.”

That assertion paralleled Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s line that tariffs are a “one-time price adjustment.” But as I wrote in “The Sleight of Hand Behind the ‘One-Time Adjustment’ and ‘Transitory’ Tariff Inflation Narrative“, for inflation to be transitory, expectations for price levels would need to revert after the initial tariff shock. Yet, “tariffs make price reversion unlikely by locking in a permanently higher cost base.” In that piece, I also pointed out how structural effects – such as wage responses, supply chain disruptions, and embedded cost pass-through behavior – make inflationary pressures from tariffs more persistent. Outcomes are also hard to anticipate as inflationary pressures cascade through the economy.

Schmid appears attuned to these systemic effects. He described “a marked increase in the upside risks around inflation along with elevated downside risks to the outlook for employment and growth,” and openly questioned the prudence of discounting these risks as fleeting. Unlike Powell, who focused on optionality and emphasized that longer-term inflation expectations remain anchored, Schmid directly acknowledged that business sentiment and price expectations are shifting in ways that could prove difficult to reverse.

Powell’s message was strategically designed to preserve policy flexibility and calm markets in the face of stagflationary fears, and in that moment, Powell succeeded. However, I remain concerned that Powell’s framing underestimates the lasting damage that tariff-related cost increases can impose on the economy. As I wrote in my critique, the idea of a “one-time adjustment” may be statistically correct but economically misleading. A new, higher price level, once established, may not simply fade away. The higher price level could reshape business behavior and household expectations for years to come.

Schmid seems to understand these risks. His closing words underscore the seriousness of the moment (emphasis mine): “With renewed price pressures likely, I am not willing to take any chances when it comes to maintaining the Fed’s credibility on inflation.” That statement signals a shift away from the complacency that defines the transitory inflation narrative on tariffs.

The Last Friendly Report on Inflation?

As the Fed slowly accepts increased inflationary risks in the future, the past provides fleeting reasons for optimism on inflation. While I have stuck by the persistent and sticky narrative on inflation, March’s CPI (Consumer Price Index) report signaled the potential start of the next leg down for core inflation…just in time for tariffs to pressure inflation upward again. From the report:

“The index for all items less food and energy rose 0.1 percent in March, following a 0.2-percent increase in February. Indexes that increased over the month include personal care, medical care, education, apparel, and new vehicles. The indexes for airline fares, motor vehicle insurance, used cars and trucks, and recreation were among the major indexes that decreased in March…

The all items less food and energy index rose 2.8 percent over the last 12 months, the smallest
12-month increase since March 2021.”

Notably, the shelter index was up 4.0% year-over-year.

The chart below suggests that, absent tariff inflationary pressures, core CPI would finally be on its last leg lower toward the Fed’s 2.0% target.

Ironically, this positive development in core CPI could give more confidence to policymakers in pressing forward with inflationary tariffs.

Bostic Concurs

In an interview on Marketplace, president and CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Raphael Bostic, appeared to concur with Schmid’s concerns:

“I think the pressures that are out there are not the best for our mandates. All the models say that the introduction to tariffs is going to put upward pressure on prices, and I’ve seen more reports of recession fears in the media and from our business contacts than I’ve heard in a year and a half or two years. And so that’s also going to put pressure on our mandate, the employment mandate, in a way that is not positive.”

Bostic’s tiny source of solace is that “the current environment today might not be the current environment tomorrow.”

Currency Correction

Typically I conclude these inflation reviews by teasing out some implications and impacts in currency markets via the U.S. dollar. This time around, there are too many tariff-related cross-currents and too much economic chaos to directly connect dots. So, instead, I take this time to describe a “currency correction” I had to make on the Canadian dollar (USD/CAD) and the Mexican peso (USD/MXN).

A month ago I explained:

“I am short USD/MXN out of a belief that economic relations with Mexico are about as bad as they can get. I could of course get proven wrong in due time. On the other hand, I am long USD/CAD because I do not think the market fully appreciates how much weaker the Canadian economy will get as it tries to match the U.S. in this economic warfare.”

I was correct for almost two weeks, but in due time I have been proven wrong. I have now closed out both trades in order to reassess my next moves. Surprisingly, the Canadian dollar has proven quite strong against the Mexican peso. The exact opposite of my expectations. That chart below shows how CAD/MXN is breaking out from an approximate triangle or wedge type pattern.

Even more importantly, USD/CAD has broken below a key support level at the same time the U.S. dollar looks poised for a fresh, major breakout against the Mexican peso. In other words, in the last 2-3 weeks, I could not have been more wrong! (Note how the 25% tariff on Canada and Mexico defined a PEAK for USD/CAD, a classic contrarian move).

While USD/CAD broke support at its 200-day moving average (DMA) (the blue line), USD/MXN HELD 200DMA support. Thus, USD/MXN looks likelyly to head even higher while USD/CAD looks likely to head even lower.

This currency correction took me by surprise. The move likely reflects the effectiveness and the robustness of Canada’s current resistance to U.S. economic warfare. Mark Carney, the new Prime Minister of Canada, has been quite clear in laying out a framework of Canadian resistance. The Governor of the Bank of Canada, Tim Macklem, has been similarly forthright in laying out the implications for monetary policy and bracing Canadians for the economic warfare ahead. Apparently, both men have, so far, succeeded in bolstering Canada’s defenses (symbolically through the Canadian dollar). The implications for inflation both here and in Canada remain to be seen as trade slows down between the two North American neighbors and former allies.

Be careful out there!

Full disclosure: no positions

The post Inflation Concerns Rise at the Federal Reserve Amid Tariff Unease appeared first on Inflation Watch.

The chart below from the Surveys of Consumers – University of Michigan shows another interesting element of the inflation story. Long-term consumer expectations for inflation have remained elevated since the pandemic. The surge in short-term expectations may be strong enough to push longer-term expectations into breakout territory.

Source for Data: the Surveys of Consumers – University of Michigan

The latest spike in inflation expectations may soon cool off like the previous ones, but I do not expect the downtrend to resume from there given the current macroeconomic and policy environment. For example, as tariff talk translates into action which in turn translates into higher prices, I fully expect inflation expectations, at least short-term, to rise above current levels.

A Tired and Topping Dollar?

Interestingly, for all the talk about how tariffs will boost the U.S. dollar, the greenback is now down for the year and looks like it will continue trending downward. The Yale Budget Lab explains how the dollar strengthens from tariffs when there is no retaliation. When countries retaliate, their domestic demand for U.S. goods may decline and as a result demand for U.S. dollars declines. Could it be that the currency market is starting to wrestle with a net impact on the dollar from tariff wars just as consumers are starting to fear inflationary impacts from tariffs?

The U.S. dollar index (DXY) topped out in mid-January and is now down 1.7% for the year. (Source: Tradingview.com)

Canadian Resistance

Perhaps the volatile action against the Canadian dollar is instructive. When I last wrote, I explained why I decided to take profits on a long USD/CAD position. That exit turned out to be timely. Just two days later, USD/CAD surged right to resistance from the double-top formed across 2016 and 2020 highs and quickly reversed. President Trump created wild currency volatility by announcing tariffs on Saturday, February 1, and then reversing two days later with a 30-day “pause” following concessions from Canada. During this episode and in its wake, an active “Buy Canadian” movement has taken hold. If tariffs are re-enacted I expect vigorous retaliation from Canada. In other words, the dollar’s rally against the Canadian dollar may have indeed peaked on February 3rd with the blow-off top.

USD/CAD broke down below support at its 50-day moving average (DMA) (the red line above) and could be on track to eventually reverse all its gains from November’s big breakout. Source: TradingView.com

Having said that, I am not yet ready to short USD/CAD. I am actually long again preparing for the possibility of one more rally (to the 50DMA or maybe even challenge the high?) before USD/CAD confirms its top. My long USD/CAD is also a small hedge against other bets against the dollar.

Be careful out there!

Full disclosure: long USD/CAD, long SPY put spread

The post Inflation Expectations Surge As the U.S. Dollar Tops Out appeared first on Inflation Watch.

For three months, the bond market has flagged stabilizing inflation starting with the Fed’s first rate cut of 50 basis points (bps). The stock market continued to rally along its uptrend lines. In parallel, the Federal Reserve signaled its second thoughts about its benigas n projections for inflation in the September Summary of Economic Projections. The stock market failed to listen and even Fed fund futures insisted on forcing the Fed into a December rate cut. The Fed delivered that rate cut with a major caveat in the December Summary of Economic Projections: hotter forecasts for inflation and economic growth and an incrementally hawkish expectation for future monetary policy rates. Accordingly, the Fed finally got the stock market’s attention as the market essentially plunged from euphoria to oversold in one day.

Long-term yields continued to increase the day of the Fed decision and the following day. The iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) sliced right through presumed support and closed right at the low for the year set in April.

I took profits on my latest round of TLT put options last week. I will not chase TLT down here. Instead, I will wait to fade the next relief rally.

Instructive Projections

The Fed’s changes were significant but consistent with the Fed’s smoke signals and the declines in the long-term bond market.

• 2025 PCE inflation of 2.3-2.6% vs. the 2.1-2.2% September projection
• 2025 federal funds rate of 3.6-4.1% vs. the 3.1-3.6% September projection
• 2025 GDP 1.8-2.2% vs. the September projection of 1.8-2.2%

Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s commentary during the press conference was instructive. Powell left no question that the Fed sees higher inflation ahead: “these median projections are somewhat higher than in September consistent with the firmer inflation projection.” He acknowledged that under-estimating inflation this year was a partial driver of higher 2025 expectations: this year’s projections have “fallen apart as we’ve approached the end of the year”. Yet, Powell also laid the foundation and rationale for keeping a bias toward easing. He pointed reiterated that the labor market is no longer contributing to inflationary pressures and its accompanying cooling has gone far enough. Moreover, activity in the housing sector has been “weak”. Accordingly, Powell claimed that “cuts will certainly help to support economic activity and the labor market while we can still make progress on inflation because policy is still meaningfully restrictive.”

I remain skeptical. Is current policy really “meaningfully restrictive”? In his opening statement, Powell declared “with today’s action we have lowered our policy rate by a full percentage point from its peak and our policy stance is now significantly less restrictive. We can therefore be more cautious as we consider further adjustments to our policy rate.” This claim only weakly translates into “meaningfully restrictive.” Moreover, financial conditions are now almost as loose as they have ever been since the pandemic per the Chicago Fed’s Adjusted National Financial Conditions Index (ANFCI).

Sure, as one reporter in the Q&A pointed out, “we haven’t seen much change in mortgages, auto loan rates, or credit card rates.” Still, the conventional measures of financial conditions are about as good as can be in the post-pandemic era. Thus, the Fed is walking a fine line between the fear of restoking firmer than expected inflation and a labor market that is noticeably cooling. In the middle, the stock market is pricing in a perfect resolution to this dilemma even with the current plunge.

Powell’s Inflation Narrative Still Rests With the Pandemic

At several points during the Q&A portion of the conference call, Powell offered his version of inflation’s recent history, its origins and drivers. I was surprised to hear him claim that the economy is still dealing with pandemic-related disruptions that are propping up inflation. Perhaps this was a thinly veiled attempt to excuse this year’s under-appreciation of inflation’s stickiness. Powell also blamed technical factors for inflation’s stickiness: the way housing rents are calculated, lags in the data, and “temporary factors like fluctuations in used car prices.” As usual, I turned a skeptical ear toward this narrative because Powell, as he consistently does, absolved the Fed of any responsibility in aiding and abetting inflation’s stickiness by keeping rates too low for too long. I reviewed the case for why the Fed should have raised earlier in “Why Monetary Policy Was Late In Responding to the Pandemic-Era Inflation Surge“). At least this year’s experience and the learning response suggests the Fed will be more circumspect. Victory over inflation is not quite at hand yet.

The Fiscal Wildcard

Circumspection and caution should be keywords going into 2025 and beyond given the uncertainties in fiscal policy. A deepening tariff war and significant tax cuts threaten the Federal Reserve’s fragile dance with inflation-fighting. The mix of opinions within the Fed are telling. In describing how individual Fed members incorporated fiscal policy risks into their forecasts, Powell responded that some members chose to try to estimate fiscal impacts, some chose to leave out fiscal impacts, and others chose not to indicate whether they included fiscal policy. That is quite a mix! Powell made it sound like people stubbornly constructed their forecasts. Anyway, this inconsistency means that the reality of fiscal actions could drive inflation estimates even higher and cause even greater caution at the Fed.

King Dollar

The U.S. dollar (DXY) was the big post-Fed winner. Fresh strength in the U.S. dollar drove the Invesco CurrencyShares Euro Currency Trust (FXE) to a new 2-year low. This breakdown sets up FXE to eventually retest the lows from 2022. Accordingly, I am finally fully on the strong dollar bandwagon. I also expect the stock market to struggle to hit new all-time highs while the U.S. dollar makes new highs.

Is the Invesco CurrencyShares Euro Currency Trust (FXE) ready to resume a downtrend that started in earnest during the financial crisis?

YouTube video of the December 18th FOMC Press Conference

Be careful out there!

Full disclosure: long SPY put spread

The post The Federal Reserve’s “Hawkishness” Finally Gets the Stock Market’s Attention appeared first on Inflation Watch.

“A strategy of repeatedly lowering the fed funds target range toward a more neutral level relies on confidence that the neutral level is materially lower than where rates are now. When I look at the available evidence, though, I see substantial signs that the neutral rate has increased in recent years, and some hints that it could be very close to where the fed funds rate is now…ces. I anticipate the FOMC will most likely need more rate cuts to finish the journey. But it’s difficult to be sure how many cuts may be needed and how soon they may need to happen.” – Navigating in shallow waters: Monetary policy strategy in a better-balanced economy, Dallas Fed President Lorie K. Logan, November 13, 2024

“Shifting from my baseline to alternative scenarios, recent information suggests to me that the risk of inflation ceasing to converge toward 2%, or moving higher, has risen, while the risk of an unwelcome deterioration in the labor market has remained unchanged or possibly fallen.” – Musalem: Remarks on Monetary Policy and the U.S. Economic Outlook, St. Louis Fed President Alberto Musalem, November 13, 2024

“While now is the time to begin dialing back the restrictiveness of monetary policy, it remains to be seen how much further interest rates will decline or where they might eventually settle.” – Longer-term Considerations for Growth and Monetary Policy, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City President and Chief Executive Officer Jeff Schmid, November 13, 2024

All three speeches included Fedspeak for caution on the pace of rate cuts while maintaining the flexibility to follow the data. These speeches also came on the same day as the release of the October CPI data. This timely convergence of caution and circumspection is important because core CPI maintained the stabilization trend in place since a low in July (see the green line below). Meanwhile, core PCE, the Fed’s favorite indicator of inflation also looks like it is stabilizing. In other words, it seems the Fed is paying attention to stabilizing inflation patterns.

Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: All Items Less Food and Energy in U.S. City Average [CPILFESL], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, November 13, 2024. U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Personal Consumption Expenditures Excluding Food and Energy (Chain-Type Price Index) [PCEPILFE], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, November 13, 2024.

Shelter costs continue to drive the bulk of inflation. For October, shelter costs constituted 65% of the year-over-year increase in the CPI. Housing costs are in a paradoxical juncture where monetary policy could help maintain elevated housing costs no matter where interest rates go. The National Assocation of Homebuilders (NAHB) laments that high interest rates contribute to contraints on supply thourgh an expensive and difficult financing environment for construction loans. On the other hand, looser monetary policy could reignite a housing demand that strains supply further and drives up prices. For now, a surprise rebound in mortgage rates is tamping down housing demand.

A Friendly Message from Gold?

While inflation is stabilizing, gold may have topped out.

Two months ago I interpreted the strength in gold as indicative of a skepticism about the Fed’s implied victory message on inflation. That trend persisted until last week. The resolution of the U.S. presidential election generated a fresh surge in Bitcoin (BTC/USD) and presumably drained interest in gold. The SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) gapped down and lost 3.0%. I was hopeful that the 50-day moving average (DMA) (the red line below) would hold as support. As a (perma) bull on gold, I added call options to supplement my core GLD position. Today’s 1.0% loss in GLD further confirmed a 50DMA breakdown. This bearish technical signal means that I am unlikely to try new short-term trades for a while.

Source for charts: TradingView.com

The new inverse correlation between gold and Bitcoin indicates a sharp shift in preferences with Bitcoin getting an added advantage from expectations of a pro-crypto regulatory regime starting next year.

The Bond Market Remains Wary

Two months ago I claimed that the bond market acted wary about the Fed’s presumed victory over inflation. Sure enough, long-term yields have steadily risen ever since. The iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT), which goes up when long-term interest rates go down, is now trading near the bottom of a presumed horizontal trading range. My strategy to fade TLT has worked all the way down.

After TLT gapped up for some reason on the CPI news, I thought I missed my latest profit opportunity. So when TLT faded back to the previous day’s close, I counted myself fortunate and took profits on my latest round of TLT put options. TLT then went on to lose 1.0% for the day.

The U.S. dollar soars

The U.S. dollar index (DXY) has benefited from one tailwind after another. Now, the presumed tailwind comes from the boost it should get with increased tariffs that also promise to prop up inflationary pressures in the economy. Fewer dollars going overseas to buy goods tips the supply/demand balance in favor of a stronger dollar. Two months ago I decided to bet on continues strength in the British pound versus the U.S. dollar by buying shares of Invesco CurrencyShares® British Pound Sterling Trust (FXB). I took the opportunity to buy when FXB tested its uptrending 50DMA. The currency ETF has continued downward from there with little sign of an imminent rebound.

Conclusion

With the Presidential election behind us, the bets on stabilizing (or even stronger) inflation are clarified for now: long Bitcoin, long gold only after Bitcoin enthusiasm wanes somehow, long U.S. dollar, and short TLT. While I sold all my Bitcoin earlier in the day, I will continue to trade by buying dips. I am conflicted on the U.S. dollar as I stubbornly hold some dollar shorts while trading in and out of dollar longs. At some point, I will commit to a dollar long by shorting EUR/USD. Europe stands to lose in the next administration with a weaker NATO, more contentious relationships, and higher tariffs in a weakening economic backdrop.

The Federal Reserve has ahead as precarious a path as ever while it gets increasingly wary about stabilizing inflation!

Full disclosure: long GLD shares and calls, long PHYS, long FXB

The post The Federal Reserve Is Paying Attention to Stabilizing Core Inflation appeared first on Inflation Watch.

The chart below shows the change in PCE in the red (and lower) line. The change in the CPI is in the blue (and higher) line.

Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: All Items Less Food and Energy in U.S. City Average [CPILFESL], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, October 10, 2024. U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Personal Consumption Expenditures Excluding Food and Energy (Chain-Type Price Index) [PCEPILFE], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, October 10, 2024.

Who is paying attention to the stabilizing trend n core inflation? The stabilization started ahead of the Fed’s 50 basis points rate cut on September 18th. The giddy anticipation of that rate cut dominated sentiment. Since then, the market has become relatively more certain about a 25 basis point cut in November.

Long-term bod yields fell going in to the Fed meeting but have since shot nearly straight up. Same for the U.S. dollar. The iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) fell again in response to the CPI report, and the U.S. dollar gained marginally. So the bond and currency markets may start anticipating a longer-lasting stabilization trend. Note how TLT has come straight down except for a one week pause above support at its 50-day moving average (DMA) (the red line below).

Source: TradingView

During this time, the U.S. dollar index (DXY) first bottomed and then shot straight up for much of October.

Source: TradingView

While both shorting bonds and going long the dollar have been profitable trades, the most interesting trading action sits with the S&P 500 (SPY). Despite rising long-term bond yields, the index managed to break out to a fresh all-time high. The September CPI report barely knocked the index off its all-time high. The S&P 500 seems to have a mind of its own and is hardly paying attention to much at all over time. Even the recent increase in the volatility index (VIX) has barely fazed the S&P 500. Moreover, this strengthening bullish appearance is happening during a time which represents the third of the stock market’s most dangerous months.

Source: TradingVIew

In other words, while stabilizing inflation could dampen the trajectory for rate cuts, the S&P 500 seems to be on a near one-way track higher going into the November Presidential elections and year-end. Cause and effect across financial instruments seems quite muted. Or maybe stock traders and investors are straining to make the case that stabilization will soon give way to a resumption of a downtrend in inflation. Either way, it is not clear who is paying attention to stabilizing core inflation.

As long as these broken correlations persist, I prefer to just follow the current trends: fade TLT rallies, buy dips in the U.S. dollar, and, yes, buy the S&P 500 (I am currently hedged with a SPY put spread).

Be careful out there!

Full disclosure: net long the U.S. dollar, long SPY put spread

The post Who Is Paying Attention to Stabilizing Core Inflation? appeared first on Inflation Watch.

These graphs show a clear victory over inflation. Still, the 70% confidence interval remains wide over a range from close to 0% to 4%.

Gold Disagrees

Gold disagrees with the Fed’s inflation victory. Gold bugs are likely staring at the top end of the PCE confidence range (or even higher!). Gold is the most interesting contradictory signal for the Fed’s victory because it has easily outperformed the S&P 500 (SPY) this year. The SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) is up 26.7% year-to-date; this performance well outpaces the S&P 500’s 19.6% gain for the year. Gold can of course gain favor for a variety of reasons, but as long as rates are trending downward, I expect gold to continue higher. Notably, GLD bounced back sharply after its initial post-Fed fade and closed last week at a fresh all-time high.

The Wary Bond Market

The bond market looks a little wary about the Fed’s presumed victory. The iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT), which goes up when long-term interest rates go down, rallied into the Fed’s announcement on monetary policy. However, TLT gapped down ahead of the news and closed lower. TLT continued lower the rest of the week. It is possible the bond market got ahead of itself in anticipating economic weakness and/or lower inflation. Either way, I am looking at the technicals of TLT and see the confirmation of a (horizontal) presumed trading range. This trading range is working against the steep uptrend in the 20-day moving average (the dotted line in the chart below) and the 50-day moving average (the red line in the chart below). Thus, some kind of trend change or resolution is likely on the way in coming weeks. The outcome may sway my interpretation of the Fed’s inflation victory.

Bowman Disagrees

Both gold and the bond market could even take cues from the one dissenting voice on the Fed. On Friday, Governor Michelle W. Bowman explained why she only wanted a 25 basis point cut: “We have not yet achieved our inflation goal.” In particular, Bowman worries the 50 basis point cut “could be interpreted as a premature declaration of victory on our price stability mandate.” Bowman is not ready to declare victory.

The next Fed meeting is not until November. There is a lot of time ahead for Fedspeak to lean against any excessive victory celebrations in the financial markets. I will keep an interested eye on the market’s reaction to sobering words of caution and restraint.

The U.S. Dollar Hangs in the Balance

The Fed’s implied victory over inflation is also the U.S. dollar’s loss. The Fed is a bit late in lowering interest rates relative to several of its peers. The European Central Bank (ECB), the Bank of England (BoE), and the Bank of Canada (BoC) each dared to lower rates ahead of the Fed’s move. Yet, currency markets stayed keenly focused on coming rate cuts from the Fed such that the U.S. dollar weakened against each of the related currencies even as other banks fell one-by-one.

The British pound, Invesco CurrencyShares® British Pound Sterling Trust (FXB), benefited the most from dollar weakness of the currencies that are in the middle of rate cut cycles. Last week, FXB broke out to a fresh 31-month high. The weekly chart below shows FXB has room to recover back to its highs from 2021. Such a run is in the cards if Fed rate cut expectations continue to point lower.

I want to get more bullish on the Canadian dollar, but Invesco CurrencyShares® Canadian Dollar Trust (FXC) barely shows signs of life. FXC is scraping along a bottom that has served as support since the lows of 2022. If FXC hurdles over the previous weekly high, I will get more constructive. In the meantime, it seems the Canadian dollar is captured by a fate similar to the U.S. dollar (DXY).

The Victory Trade

So far, the Fed’s victory over inflation looks like victory for gold and the British pound. The story from the stock market is mixed. While the S&P 500 is back to an all-time high, the NASDAQ remains below a bearish topping pattern. Small caps are languishing. I do not expect the story to get clearer during October given its reputation as one of the stock market’s most dangerous months. Thus I am (short-term) neutral on the stock market as a whole while I remain (perma) bullish on gold. Gold is my inflation victory trade.

Be careful out there!

Full disclosure: long GLD, long SPY put spread, long QQQ put spread, net long USD

The post What A Victory Over Inflation Looks Like to the Federal Reserve appeared first on Inflation Watch.

Nevermind that a read hotter than consensus has little impact on the current trend. The chart below from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics shows that even as core CPI (all items less food and energy) is flattening out a bit (the red line), the “sticky” shelter component of inflation is still hurtling downward (the purple line).

With the trend still favoring the death of inflation, I think of “sticky” as a reference to people’s impatience with an inflation component taking too long to converge with the overall average inflation level. The CPI report highlighted the relative stubbornness of shelter inflation:

“The shelter index increased 0.6 percent in January, and was the largest factor in the monthly increase in the index for all items less food and energy. The index for owners’ equivalent rent rose 0.6 percent over the month, while the index for rent increased 0.4 percent. The lodging away from home index increased 1.8 percent in January…The shelter index increased 6.0 percent over the last year, accounting for over two thirds of the total 12-month increase in the all items less food and energy index.”

The bubble chart below from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics shows the outsized influence of services less energy services on total inflation (the large purple bubble). This major component includes shelter. Its relative importance of 60.9 dwarfs the relative importance of all other major components of inflation.

Given the angst directed at the shelter component of inflation, I looked at what the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) had to say about this CPI report. The industry group provided a reassuring conclusion: “the NAHB forecast expects to see shelter costs decline further in the coming months.  This is supported by real-time data from private data providers that indicate a cooling in rent growth.” So while the housing price picture is mixed with existing homes on the uptick and new homes on the downtick, overall rents should continue a cooling pace as expected.

Unfortunately for those traders and investors buying stocks and bonds in anticipation of rate cuts, this reminder of inflation’s stickiness pushed out expectations for the first rate cut from the Federal Reserve. Over-eager financial markets pushed out the first rate cut from May to June. This is a bitter pill to swallow for those who started buying stocks and bonds late last year in anticipation of a rate cut in March (because the Fed admitted to inflation’s death of course). The chart from the CME FedWatch Tool shows how the odds favoring a May rate cut immediately evaporated.

The Fizzle and Sizzle in Financial Markets

Interestingly, currency markets and the bond market have been moving counter to the rallies in the S&P 500 (SPY) and the NASDAQ (COMPX). The 2024 rally in the U.S. dollar index (DXY) has taken the index ABOVE the point where currency traders dumped the dollar in the wake of inflation’s death. The chart below from Tradingview.com shows a bullish breakout for the dollar last month above its 50-day moving average (DMA) (the red line) and a successful test of the trend line as support earlier this month.

The dollar’s rally complicates my bullish trades on the Canadian dollar but also provides my latest opportunity to fade USD/CAD (Invesco CurrencyShares Canadian Dollar Trust (FXC)) within the trading range. I am net long the U.S. dollar by being short EUR/USD (Invesco CurrencyShares Euro Currency Trust (FXE)).

Excluding a sharp countertrend rally at the end of January, iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has sold off most of 2024.

These trends further reinforce the notion and fear that perhaps earlier rate cut expectations were indeed premature. After the market’s pullback (the S&P 500 lost 1.4% and remains in an uptrend) will stocks also concede the point or will they return to ignoring deteriorating market breadth and other signs of caution in the stock market?

The volatility index (VIX) may have already blown off enough steam to soothe the groans of the bulls…for now. Note carefully how the VIX stopped going down this year and thus has an ever so slight uptrend going…

Be careful out there!

Full disclosure: net long U.S. dollar

The post From Inflation Fizzle to Sizzle appeared first on Inflation Watch.

The key trigger word was “any.” The first question from the press zoomed directly on the insertion of “any” in the following section of the Fed’s policy statement (emphasis mine):

“In determining the extent of any additional policy firming that may be appropriate to return inflation to 2 percent over time, the Committee will take into account the cumulative tightening of monetary policy, the lags with which monetary policy affects economic activity and inflation, and economic and financial developments.”

Powell’s response essentially confirmed that the Fed thinks it is done fighting inflation with rate hikes. The Fed is so confident that it is now considering how to conduct a rate easing cycle.

“We added the word ‘any’ as an acknowledgement that we believe that we are likely at or near the peak rate for this cycle. Participants didn’t write down additional hikes that we believe are likely…but participants didn’t want to take the possibility of further hikes off the table.”

The last part about keeping rate hikes on the table is just obligatory caution that in name keeps the Fed’s options open just in case.

The next question came from Governor Chris Waller’s claim that the Fed could be cutting rates in the next several months if inflation continued to fall. Powell of course did not respond directly to the commentary, but he affirmed that the Fed has its mind on rate cuts for 2024:

“…the other question of when will it become appropriate to begin dialing back the amount of policy restraint in place that begins to come into view and is clearly a topic of discussion out in the world and and also a discussion for us at our meeting today.”

Note Powell conditioned his remarks to say that “no one is declaring victory, that would be premature.” But again, this is obligatory caution. Victory is practically oozing out of every pore of this meeting. The Fed has to take small and methodical steps in its march to victory.

Inflation Is Dead

Powell’s most revealing answer came to a question about what motivates the Fed to consider rate cuts:

“Both headline and core [inflation] have come down really significantly in three months, that’s a big piece of this. At the same time growth has turned out to be very strong in the third quarter is slowing we believe as appropriate, and we’ve got we’ve had several labor market reports which suggest again significant progress toward greater balance across a very a broad range of indicators. You’re seeing so many of the indicators come back to normal.”

Importantly, Powell noted later in the Q&A that the Fed has seen progress in the most worrisome component of the inflation basket: non-housing services. Now, all three components of core inflation are contributing to inflation’s demise.

Powell further stated that a rate hike is no longer the base case unlike 60 or 90 days ago. He pointed to individual board members who have assessments about the timing for reducing tight policy when saying “that is a discussion we’ll be having going forward.”

Notably, while Powell insisted the job remains to get inflation down to 2%, he acknowledged in response to a reminder about statements in July that the Fed cannot wait until 2% inflation to start cutting rates:

“The reason you wouldn’t wait to get the 2% to cut rates is that policy would be it would be too late. You’d want to be reducing restriction on the economy well before 2% so you don’t overshoot…you know it takes a while for policy to get into the economy and affect inflation.”

Financial Markets Are Ready for Rate Cuts Sooner Than Later

At one point recently, financial markets pessimistically rolled back the first rate cut to September, 2024. Going into this meeting, the market planted the flag on a March rate cut but retreated the day before in the wake of November CPI data. At the time of writing, the first rate cut is firmly rooted in March (source: CME FedWatch) – follow the blue colored boxes for the most likely scenario for a given interest rate policy (labeled across the top of the chart) and a given meeting date (labelled across the left side of the chart).

The comparison chart below shows how the odds for a March rate cut were 39.7% yesterday but 54% a week ago. A month ago the odds were a mere 10.5%. Market opinion has changed rapidly!

Conclusion

In the end, Inflation Watch will stay on the case. The situation remains uncertain and the citizenry are still not happy about prices. Powell admitted as much:

“The price level is not coming down…so people are still living with high prices and that’s something people don’t like. Real wages are now positive so that wages are now moving up more than inflation. As inflation comes down that might help improve the mood of people.”

So while the Fed keeps working, and wages keep trying to outpace inflation, Inflation Watch will keep on watching and reporting!

In the meantime, see below the dramatic impact of the Fed’s declaration of victory on the U.S. dollar (DXY); the recent downtrend looks ready to resume (source: TradingVIew.com).

Full disclosure: long and short U.S. currency pairs

The post The Federal Reserve Makes It Official: Inflation Is Dead appeared first on Inflation Watch.

Don’t Come Crying to the Fed Anytime Soon

Bostic definitively stated that the Fed is so determined to press against inflation that it will likely turn a deaf ear to those who will ask for easier monetary conditions the moment the labor market delivers bad news. Emphasis mine:

“You know, as we get further into inflation getting, closer to our target, I’m expecting we’re going to see stresses in labor markets. We’ve not really seen that. And when that starts to happen, people are going to be looking to us to try to do something about that as well, and maybe turn away from our focus on inflation. But we can’t do that, because failing in getting the inflation back to the 2% target will be much more problematic for the economy. And so as people start to call out for action to provide relief in labor markets, I think what we’re going to have to do is just stay laser focused on the fact that, you know, our employment mandate goal, we are very, very close to that right now. And we’re not close to that in inflation. So we have to stay focused on inflation.”

The bad news for the labor market has been long anticipated and stubbornly absent for the people who keep expecting a recession at every turn of the calendar. This “lagging indicator” of economic health just keeps chugging along. Even a recent uptick in initial unemployment claims above 240,000 fizzled out before the “I told you so’s” could drape the economic headlines. The 251,000 in weekly initial claims from January, 2022 stands as the latest high. For now, initial claims continues to tell the same message week after week after week: the Fed has room to hike if inflation remains an issue. Rate cuts are certainly nowhere on the horizon from this vantage point.

Source: U.S. Employment and Training Administration, Initial Claims [ICSA], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; May 25, 2023.

Given this data and Bostic’s determination to ignore anyone who wants the Fed to cut rates into an inflationary environment, I understand Bostic’s best guess target for rate cuts set a year or more out from now.

“My best case is that we won’t be thinking about a cut until well into 2024. And, you know, inflation is just double what our target is by just about every measure. I don’t see scenarios where the economy is going to evolve in a way such that inflation gets close enough to our target where we might contemplate any kind of cut.”

As of the time of writing, Fed fund futures have acquiesced to the likelihood of another rate hike by July. However, they still eagerly anticipate rate cuts as soon as November. By the time Bostic guesses the Fed will think about cuts, the futures think the Fed will have 6 or 7 rate cuts in the books. The persistently wide gulf between Fed and market expectations on rate policy remains one of the more remarkable features of today’s financial markets.

Fresh Wind for the U.S. Dollar

The market’s push for another rate hike by July has helped the U.S. dollar regain momentum. Strength particularly against the euro and the Japanese yen has the dollar index (DXY) bouncing off its lows for the year. I am riding this momentum as long as it holds up. If the rally continues from here, I expect fresh resistance at the year’s high which should also coincide at the time with critical resistance from the 200-day moving average (DMA) (the bluish line below).

Source: TradingView.com

Be careful out there!

Full disclosure: net long the U.S. dollar

The post Fed’s Bostic: Still Comfortable Leaning Into Tight Labor Markets appeared first on Inflation Watch.

For more details see “Government asks Iranians to stop buying dollars” (CNBC, November 19, 2011).

The post Inflation helps drive Iranians to dollars and gold, government warns citizens to stop appeared first on Inflation Watch.