Sat. May 30th, 2026
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: All Items Less Food and Energy in U.S. City Average [CPILFESL], retrieved from FRED; U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Personal Consumption Expenditures Excluding Food and Energy (Chain-Type Price Index) [PCEPILFE], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, May 28, 2026.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: All Items Less Food and Energy in U.S. City Average [CPILFESL], retrieved from FRED; U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Personal Consumption Expenditures Excluding Food and Energy (Chain-Type Price Index) [PCEPILFE], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, May 28, 2026.

When I flagged the core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) leapfrogging over the core Consumer Price Index (CPI), I warned that the last time such a crossover happened was several months into the pandemic. Since then, my worry has amplified with the increasing trend in the core PCE. The latest data in the Personal Income and Outlays for April, 2026 from the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) shows the year-over-year change in the PCE increasing to 3.3%, a level last seen about two and a half years ago. This uptrend suggests that core CPI could be in the early stages of a sustained rise off a post-pandemic low.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: All Items Less Food and Energy in U.S. City Average [CPILFESL], retrieved from FRED; U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Personal Consumption Expenditures Excluding Food and Energy (Chain-Type Price Index) [PCEPILFE], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, May 28, 2026.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: All Items Less Food and Energy in U.S. City Average [CPILFESL], retrieved from FRED; U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Personal Consumption Expenditures Excluding Food and Energy (Chain-Type Price Index) [PCEPILFE], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, May 28, 2026.

A decline in the price of housing services has been at the center of the long-standing narrative dismissing the significance of this years long stickiness in inflation. Unfortunately, those hopes are less tenable than ever in this cycle. In April, housing experienced its highest month-over-month PCE increase since at least the beginning of 2025. This sticky inflation is unlikely to cool while housing inflation remains elevated.

Thus, the long-awaited rate cuts that new Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh was supposed to deliver for the President seem quite remote. Financial markets do not even have a rate cut among the range of possibilities this year. The CME FedWatch tool shows the odds of a rate cut at less than 1% going all the way out to July, 2027. The odds of a rate HIKE push above 50% starting with the January, 2027 meeting (see the red circle in the upper right corner of the chart below).

Target Rate Probabilities for 27 Jan 2027 Fed Meeting (CME FedWatch Tool)
Target Rate Probabilities for 27 Jan 2027 Fed Meeting (CME FedWatch Tool)

Meanwhile, loose financial conditions per the Adjusted National Financial Conditions Index (ANFCI) suggest the case for rate cuts remains quite weak.

The adjusted national financial conditions index (ANCF) shows loose financial conditions. Rising rates have only slightly (re)tightened conditions.
The adjusted national financial conditions index (ANCF) shows loose financial conditions. Rising rates have only slightly (re)tightened conditions.

Bonds Push Gold to the Sidelines

Typically, this is the point where I celebrate gold as a good buy in the face of increasing inflation risks. However, the bond market woke up to increasing inflation risks after the war started. For example, a day after the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) broke down from a 4-month high on the first wartime trading day, SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) also broke down.

The iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has rebounded sharply but it remains in a downtrend in place since the war against Iran started.
The iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has rebounded sharply but it remains in a downtrend in place since the war against Iran started.
The SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) looks positioned for a major breakdown below support that has held since December.
The SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) looks positioned for a major breakdown below support that has held since December.

Both TLT and GLD have been in downtrends ever since the war started (interest rates increase when bond prices decrease). While TLT printed a sharp bottom last week thanks to a sudden drop in oil prices, gold continued to fall.

As long as financial markets expect the Fed’s next move to be a rate hike, I expect GLD to trade poorly. Right now, GLD is precariously perched at an important support formed from the convergence of the 200-day moving average (DMA) (the blue line above) and GLD’s former all-time high from October, 2025. GLD experienced an impressive bounce off the horizontal support line in late March. However, given the definitive failure at resistance at the 50DMA (the red line), I expect the current tepid bounce to give way to continued weakness in GLD.

Thus, I am staying away from buying back into GLD until it can achieve a breakout above 50DMA resistance. In the meantime, I continue to accumulate TLT in anticipation of a day off in the future when yields come down definitively.

Be careful out there!

Full disclosure: long TLT

Thanks for considering Inflation Watch as a part of your education on economics and the dynamics of prices in the economy.

Sign up to receive timely notifications of blog posts in your inbox.

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Thanks for considering Inflation Watch as a part of your education on economics and the dynamics of prices in the economy.

Sign up to receive timely notifications of blog posts in your inbox.

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *